题目
A company manufactures copper pipes. The pipes are produced by two different machines, and . An inspector claims that the mean diameter of the pipes produced by machine is greater than the mean diameter of the pipes produced by machine . He takes a random sample of 12 pipes produced by machine and measures their diameters, cm. His results are summarised as follows.
He also takes a random sample of 10 pipes produced by machine and measures their diameters in cm. His results are as follows.
The diameters of the pipes produced by each machine are assumed to be normally distributed with equal population variances.
Test at the 2.5% significance level whether the data supports the inspector’s claim.
题目中文翻译
一家公司生产铜管。铜管由两台不同的机器 和 生产。一名检验员声称,机器 生产的铜管平均直径大于机器 生产的铜管平均直径。他随机抽取 12 根由机器 生产的铜管,并测量它们的直径,记为 cm。结果汇总如下。
他还随机抽取 10 根由机器 生产的铜管,并测量它们的直径,单位为 cm。结果如下。
假设每台机器生产的铜管直径都服从正态分布,并且总体方差相等。
在 2.5% 显著性水平下检验数据是否支持该检验员的说法。
原卷通用作答要求
Answer all questions. You should use a calculator where appropriate.
You must show all necessary working clearly; no marks will be given for unsupported answers from a calculator.
Give non-exact numerical answers correct to 3 significant figures, or 1 decimal place for angles in degrees, unless a different level of accuracy is specified in the question.
请回答所有题目。适当时应使用计算器。必须清楚展示所有必要的计算过程;仅给出计算器答案而没有过程,不予评分。除非题目另有精度要求,非精确数值答案保留 3 位有效数字,以度为单位的角度保留 1 位小数。
解答
解法一
思路
展开
两个独立小样本来自等方差的正态总体。合并组内离差后,检验机器 的平均直径是否较大。
答题过程
展开
Let and be the population mean diameters. Test against . For machine B, the measurements give and . The sample means are and . The unbiased variance estimates are
The pooled variance is
The test statistic is
The upper critical value with degrees of freedom is . Since the statistic is smaller, we fail to reject . There is insufficient evidence at the level that machine A produces pipes with a greater population mean diameter.