题目
Problem
(i) Use a counter example to show that the following statement is false
“n2+3n+1 is prime for all n∈N”
(2)
(ii) Use algebra to prove by exhaustion that for all n∈N
“n2−2 is not a multiple of 4”
(4)
题目中文翻译
(i) 用一个反例说明下列命题为假:
“对所有 n∈N,n2+3n+1 都是质数。”
(2分)
(ii) 用代数方法,通过穷尽所有情形证明:对所有 n∈N,
“n2−2 不是 4 的倍数。”
(4分)
解答
(i)
解法一
思路
展开
反例只需要找到一个自然数使表达式不是质数。这里可以试 n=6,因为算出来是 55。
答题过程
展开
Take
n=6.
Then
n2+3n+1===62+3(6)+136+18+155.
But
55=5×11,
so 55 is not prime.
Therefore, the statement is false.
(ii)
解法一
思路
展开
任意自然数不是奇数就是偶数,所以只需分两类讨论。这就是 exhaustion:把所有可能情况列完。
答题过程
展开
Every natural number is either even or odd. In the following cases, k is an integer.
If n is even, let
n=2k.
Then
n2−2==(2k)2−24k2−2.
This is 2 less than a multiple of 4, so it is not a multiple of 4.
If n is odd, let
n=2k+1.
Then
n2−2====(2k+1)2−24k2+4k+1−24k2+4k−14(k2+k)−1.
This is 1 less than a multiple of 4, so it is not a multiple of 4.
Therefore, in all cases, n2−2 is not a multiple of 4.
解法二
思路
展开
按除以 4 的余数,把所有自然数穷尽分为四类,逐类展开 n2−2 并写成 4 的倍数加 2 或 3。
答题过程
展开
For an integer k, every natural number has one of the forms 4k, 4k+1, 4k+2, 4k+3.
Case 1: n=4k.
n2−2=16k2−2=4(4k2−1)+2.
Case 2: n=4k+1.
n2−2==16k2+8k−14(4k2+2k−1)+3.
Case 3: n=4k+2.
n2−2==16k2+16k+24(4k2+4k)+2.
Case 4: n=4k+3.
n2−2==16k2+24k+74(4k2+6k+1)+3.
In every case the remainder on division by 4 is 2 or 3, never 0. Thus n2−2 is not a multiple of 4 for any n∈N. ■