题目
A student was asked to prove, for , that
“if is a multiple of 3, then must be a multiple of 3”
The start of the student’s proof by contradiction is shown in the box below.
(a) Show the calculations and statements that are required to complete the proof.
(b) Hence prove, by contradiction, that is an irrational number.
题目中文翻译
一名学生被要求证明:对 ,
“如果 是 3 的倍数,那么 必须是 3 的倍数”
该学生用反证法证明的开头已在下框中给出。
(a) 写出完成该证明所需要的计算和论述。
(b) 进而用反证法证明 是无理数。
解答
(a)
解法一
思路
展开
题框已经处理了 的情况。若自然数 不是 的倍数,它还可能写成 ;展开其立方并证明仍不是 的倍数,即可让两个可能情况都与原假设矛盾。
答题过程
展开
The case has already been considered in the question.
For the other possible case, let
Then
Let
Since is an integer,
Therefore, is not a multiple of .
If is not a multiple of , it must be of the form or . Both cases show that is not a multiple of , contradicting the assumption that is a multiple of .
Hence, if is a multiple of , then
另一种情况也可写成 ;这与 只相差 的选取。此时
Let
Then is an integer and
which is not a multiple of . Together with the case in the question, this gives the same contradiction and conclusion.
原来的 展开也可直接说明:、、 都能被 整除, 但 不能,所以总和不能被 整除。这是同一余数判断,不是另一套解法。
(b)
解法一
思路
展开
承接 (a),假设 是有理数,并把它写成最简分数 。立方后先由 (a) 推出 是 的倍数,再代回推出 也是 的倍数;这与 互质矛盾。
答题过程
展开
Assume, for a contradiction, that is rational. Then it can be written in lowest terms as
where , , and and have no common factor greater than .
Cubing both sides gives
so
Thus is a multiple of . By part (a), is a multiple of , so let
for some . Substituting this into ,
Hence is also a multiple of . By part (a), is a multiple of .
Therefore, both and have a common factor of . This contradicts the assumption that is in lowest terms.
Hence