题目
Problem
The number of emails per hour received by a helpdesk were recorded. The results for a
random sample of 80 one-hour periods are shown in the table.
| Number of emails per hour | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|
| Frequencies | 1 | 10 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 3 |
(a) Show that the mean number of emails per hour in the sample is 3
(1)
The manager believes that the number of emails per hour received could be modelled by
a Poisson distribution.
The following table shows some of the expected frequencies.
| Number of emails per hour | Expected Frequencies |
|---|
| 0 | r |
| 1 | 11.949 |
| 2 | 17.923 |
| 3 | 17.923 |
| 4 | 13.443 |
| 5 | s |
| 6+ | t |
(b) Find the values of r, s and t, giving your answers to 3 decimal places.
(4)
(c) Using a 10% significance level, test whether or not a Poisson model is reasonable.
You should clearly state your hypotheses, test statistic and the critical value used.
(7)
(Total 12 marks)
题目中文翻译
记录了帮助台每小时收到的邮件数量。随机抽取的 80 个一小时区间的结果如下表。
| 每小时邮件数 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|
| 频数 | 1 | 10 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 3 |
(a) 证明样本中每小时邮件数的平均值为 3。
经理认为,每小时收到的邮件数量可以用泊松分布来建模。
下表给出了一些期望频数。
| 每小时邮件数 | 期望频数 |
|---|
| 0 | r |
| 1 | 11.949 |
| 2 | 17.923 |
| 3 | 17.923 |
| 4 | 13.443 |
| 5 | s |
| 6+ | t |
(b) 求 r、s 和 t 的值,答案保留 3 位小数。
(c) 在 10% 显著性水平下,检验泊松模型是否合理。
你应清楚写出原假设、检验统计量和所用的临界值。
解答
(a)
解法一
思路
展开
用各邮件数乘以相应频数,所得总和除以样本量 80,即可求得样本均值。
答题过程
展开
The sample mean is
xˉ===800(1)+1(10)+2(23)+3(15)+4(19)+5(9)+6(3)802403.
(b)
解法一
思路
展开
以样本均值估计泊松分布参数,所以 λ=3。各单点的期望频数为 80P(X=x);最后一组是 X⩾6,可用总期望频数为 80 求补集。
答题过程
展开
Let X∼Po(3). For x=0,1,2,…,
P(X=x)=x!e−33x.
Hence
r====80P(X=0)80e−33.982965…3.983,
and
s====80P(X=5)80(5!e−335)8.065505…8.066.
Using the fact that the expected frequencies sum to 80,
t===80−(r+11.949+17.923+17.923+13.443+s)6.713…6.713.
(c)
解法一
思路
展开
先提出泊松模型是否合理的假设。由于 X=0 的期望频数小于 5,把 0 与 1 合并后进行卡方拟合优度检验。合并后有 6 组,并从样本估计了一个参数,因此自由度为 6−1−1=4。
答题过程
展开
The hypotheses are
H0:H1: a Poisson distribution is a reasonable model, a Poisson distribution is not a reasonable model.
Since the expected frequency for X=0 is less than 5, the classes X=0 and X=1 are combined.
| Number of emails | Observed frequency, O | Expected frequency, E |
|---|
| ⩽1 | 11 | 15.932 |
| 2 | 23 | 17.923 |
| 3 | 15 | 17.923 |
| 4 | 19 | 13.443 |
| 5 | 9 | 8.066 |
| ⩾6 | 3 | 6.713 |
The test statistic is
χ2===∑E(O−E)215.932(11−15.932)2+17.923(23−17.923)2+17.923(15−17.923)2+13.443(19−13.443)2+8.066(9−8.066)2+6.713(3−6.713)27.901…
There are 6 classes after combining, and one parameter has been estimated, so
ν=6−1−1=4.
At the 10% significance level, the critical value is
χ42(0.10)=7.779.
Since
7.901>7.779,
the test statistic lies in the critical region. Therefore, H0 is rejected. There is sufficient evidence at the 10% significance level to conclude that a Poisson distribution is not a reasonable model for the number of emails received per hour.