Skip to content
CalcGospel 國際數學圖譜
返回

IAL 2026 Jan S3 A Q5

A Level / Edexcel / S3

IAL 2026 Jan A Paper · Question 5

题目

Problem

Jeff records the number of births announced in his local weekly newspaper each week for nn consecutive weeks, where nn is an integer. He decides the resulting data can be modelled as independent samples from a Poisson distribution with mean 2.8 and calculates the expected frequencies using this model.

The following table shows the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies, to 2 decimal places.

The observed and expected frequencies for 5 births are not given.

Number of birthsObserved frequency (OO)Expected frequency (EE)
085.84
12716.35
22522.88
31621.36
41214.95
5aabb
623.91
7\geqslant 712.34

(a) Find the value of aa and the value of bb

(2)

The value of (OE)2E\sum \dfrac{(O - E)^2}{E} for the given values for the number of births 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 is 9.86

(b) Using a 5% significance level, test whether or not this Poisson model is suitable. Show your working clearly, stating your hypotheses, test statistic and critical value.

(7)
(Total for Question 5 is 9 marks)
题目中文翻译

Jeff 连续 n 周记录当地周报上每周公布的新生婴儿数,其中 n 为整数。他认为这些数据可以用均值为 2.8 的泊松分布的独立样本来建模,并据此计算期望频数。

下表给出了观测频数和期望频数,期望频数保留到 2 位小数。

出生数为 5 的观测频数和期望频数没有给出。

出生数观测频数 (O)期望频数 (E)
085.84
12716.35
22522.88
31621.36
41214.95
5ab
623.91
≥ 712.34

(a) 求 a 和 b 的值。

对于出生数 0、1、2、3 和 4,∑((O - E)^2 / E) = 9.86。

(b) 在 5% 的显著性水平下检验该泊松模型是否适合。请清楚写出你的过程,说明原假设、检验统计量和临界值。

解答

(a)

解法一

思路

展开

若每周出生数 XPo(2.8)X\sim\operatorname{Po}(2.8),则 0 次出生的概率为 e2.8e^{-2.8},所以 0 次出生的期望频数为 ne2.8ne^{-2.8}。结合题目给出的两位小数及 nn 必须为整数,可确定 n=96n=96;然后分别用观测频数总和及泊松概率求 aabb

答题过程

展开

Let XX be the number of births announced in a week. Under the proposed model,

XPo(2.8).X\sim\operatorname{Po}(2.8).

The expected frequency for zero births is

nP(X=0)=ne2.8.nP(X=0)=ne^{-2.8}.

Since the displayed expected frequency is 5.845.84 to 2 decimal places and nn is an integer,

96e2.8=5.8377665.84,96e^{-2.8}=5.837766\ldots\approx5.84,

so n=96n=96.

The known observed frequencies total

8+27+25+16+12+2+1=91.8+27+25+16+12+2+1=91.

Hence,

a=9691=5.a=96-91=\boxed{5}.

For 5 births, the expected frequency is

b=96P(X=5)=96(e2.82.855!)=8.3725=8.37(2 d.p.).\begin{align*} b =&\,96P(X=5)\\ =&\,96\left(e^{-2.8}\frac{2.8^5}{5!}\right)\\ =&\,8.3725\ldots\\ =&\,\boxed{8.37}\quad\text{(2 d.p.)}. \end{align*}

(b)

解法一

思路

展开

这是卡方拟合优度检验。由于“6 次”和“至少 7 次”的期望频数都小于 5,先合并为一个尾部组,使其观测频数为 33、期望频数为 6.256.25。再把题目已给的前五组贡献 9.869.86 与其余两组贡献相加。模型参数 2.8 是预先给定而非由样本估计,因此 7 个合并后类别给出 71=67-1=6 个自由度。

答题过程

展开

Let H0H_0 be the hypothesis that a Poisson distribution with mean 2.8 is a suitable model.

Let H1H_1 be the hypothesis that a Poisson distribution with mean 2.8 is not a suitable model.

The final two classes must be combined because their individual expected frequencies are less than 5. For the combined class,

O=2+1=3,E=3.91+2.34=6.25.O=2+1=3, \qquad E=3.91+2.34=6.25.

Using the contribution 9.869.86 given for 0 to 4 births,

χ2=9.86+(58.37)28.37+(36.25)26.25=12.91=12.9(3 s.f.).\begin{align*} \chi^2 =&\,9.86+\frac{(5-8.37)^2}{8.37}\\ +&\,\frac{(3-6.25)^2}{6.25}\\ =&\,12.91\ldots\\ =&\,12.9\quad\text{(3 s.f.)}. \end{align*}

After combining, there are 7 classes. Since the mean 2.8 was specified and was not estimated from the data,

ν=71=6.\nu=7-1=6.

At the 5%5\% significance level, the critical value is

χ6,0.052=12.592.\chi^2_{6,0.05}=12.592.

Since

12.9>12.592,12.9>12.592,

the result is significant and H0H_0 is rejected. The data are not consistent with a Poisson distribution with mean 2.8, so the proposed model is not suitable.